A writ petition before the Supreme Court has revived a crucial question in cross-border marriages: Can Indian courts stop a spouse from pursuing divorce proceedings in a foreign country when Indian law governs the marriage? Can Indian Courts Restrain Divorce Proceedings Abroad? The issue arises frequently as Indian marriages increasingly intersect with foreign legal systems.
Background of the Case that raise question Can Indian Courts Restrain Divorce Proceedings Abroad?
In the present case, a woman has challenged divorce proceedings initiated by her husband in Rhode Island, United States. The marriage was solemnised under Indian Christian rites and later registered in Tamil Nadu under the Tamil Nadu Registration of Marriages Act, 2009. Importantly, the woman continues to be domiciled in India.
According to the petition, the husband initiated divorce proceedings in October 2025 without her consent and without her submitting to the jurisdiction of the US court. She alleges that the move amounts to forum shopping and transnational matrimonial abuse. Moreover, she claims the proceedings violate her fundamental rights and aim to defeat Indian matrimonial law. Can Indian courts restrain divorce proceedings ?
When Are Foreign Divorce Decrees Recognised in India? Can Indian Courts Restrain Divorce Proceedings Abroad?
Indian law does not automatically recognise foreign divorce decrees. Instead, Sections 13 and 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, govern recognition. A foreign judgment fails to bind Indian courts if it lacks jurisdiction, violates Indian law, offends natural justice, or results from fraud.
Additionally, Section 44A CPC allows execution of decrees from reciprocating territories. However, courts permit execution only when the decree satisfies the tests under Section 13.
In Y. Narasimha Rao v. Y. Venkata Lakshmi (1991), the Supreme Court clarified the law. It held that matrimonial disputes must be decided by courts with competent jurisdiction under the parties’ personal law and domicile. Consequently, Indian courts do not recognise foreign divorces obtained unilaterally or on grounds unavailable under Indian law.
Indian Christian Law and Matrimonial Jurisdiction
Indian law clearly separates solemnisation and dissolution of marriage. While the Indian Christian Marriage Act governs solemnisation, the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 governs divorce.
Furthermore, Section 88 of the Christian Marriage Act preserves the authority of personal law over marital status. Therefore, Indian courts determine dissolution according to Indian statutes when parties remain domiciled in India.
Can Indian Courts Stop Foreign Proceedings?
Indian courts may issue anti-suit injunctions in appropriate cases. In Modi Entertainment Network v. WSG Cricket, the Supreme Court held that courts must exercise this power cautiously. However, courts may intervene when foreign proceedings appear oppressive or unjust.
Similarly, in Vivek Rai Gupta v. Niyati Gupta, the Supreme Court restrained enforcement of a US divorce decree obtained in violation of its interim directions. The Court emphasised that litigants cannot benefit from disobeying Indian court orders.
Limits of Indian Court Powers
Indian courts exercise jurisdiction in personam, not territorial jurisdiction abroad. Therefore, they cannot control foreign courts or prevent enforcement of decrees overseas. However, they can stop a party from relying on such decrees within India.
Consequently, a foreign divorce may remain valid abroad. Nevertheless, Indian courts may refuse recognition if the decree defeats Indian law or equity.
Conclusion
Cross-border divorces raise serious concerns for Indian spouses. Therefore, Indian courts continue to protect parties from unilateral foreign divorces that undermine Indian personal law. The Supreme Court’s decision in this case may further strengthen safeguards against transnational matrimonial abuse.
Know more: Afraid of Using Public Toilets? Know About Washroom Anxiety